##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Croatian local and regional self-government units are obliged to conduct public consultations when adopting general acts that affect the interests of citizens and legal entities. Bearing that in mind, the aim of this paper is to determine whether there are certain omissions – confirmed by the High Administrative Court of the Republic of Croatia – in the implementation of public consultations in the procedure of adopting general acts and, if there are, what they consist of. To this aim, the paper analyzes the decisions of the mentioned Court in procedures for assessing the legality of general acts adopted by local and regional self-government units. After the first introductory part, the second part briefly explains the normative framework, the third part states the methodology used, the fourth part analyzes the judicial practice, and in the fifth part, concluding remarks are stated. The analysis shows that since 2013, when the obligation to conduct public consultation was introduced, the Court has abolished 11 general acts. In the process of adopting those acts, the public consultation procedure was not conducted in accordance with the law: the first and the most common reason for contesting the general act was the absence of public consultation, and the second reason for that was non-compliance with the prescribed deadline of 30 days. Although practice has shown some other reasons as well, they all boil down to the fact that public consultation was not conducted.

References

  1. Administrative Disputes Act. (2010). Official Gazette no. 20/10, 143/12, 152/14, 94/16, 29/17, 110/21.
     Google Scholar
  2. Blagojević, A. & Tucak, I. (2021). Pravni i institucionalni okvir hrvatske lokalne samouprave [Legal and institutional framework of Croatian local self-government]. Pravni fakultet Osijek, Sveučilište Josipa Jurja Strossmayera u Osijeku.
     Google Scholar
  3. Code of Consultation with the Interested Public in the Procedures of Enacting Laws, Other Regulations and Acts. (2009). Official Gazette no. 140/09.
     Google Scholar
  4. Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia. (2013). Decision no. U-II-1304/2013 of 16. July 2013. Retrieved from: https://narodne-novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/2013_07_99_2258.html.
     Google Scholar
  5. Dobrić Jambrović, D. (2020). European standards in regulating public participation on subnational levels: The case of Croatia. In C. N. Silva (Ed.), Contemporary trends in local governance: Reform, cooperation and citizen participation (pp. 217–239). Springer.
     Google Scholar
  6. Džinić, J. & Škarica, M. (2017). Uloga neposredno biranih načelnika i župana u poboljšanju kvalitete odnosa građana i lokalne i regionalne samouprave [The role of directly elected mayors in improving the relationship of citizens and local and regional self-government]. In I. Koprić, A. Musa & T. Giljević (Eds.), Građani, javna uprava i lokalna samouprava: povjerenje, suradnja, potpora (pp. 195–228). Institut za javnu upravu.
     Google Scholar
  7. High Administrative Court of the Republic of Croatia. (2017). Decision no. Usoz-120/16-5 of February 28 2017. https://narodne-novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/2017_03_29_671.html. Accessed: 11.6.2023.
     Google Scholar
  8. High Administrative Court of the Republic of Croatia. (2021). Decision no. Usoz-153/20-5 of 29 November 2021. https://narodne-novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/2022_01_5_50.html. Accessed: 11.6.2023.
     Google Scholar
  9. High Administrative Court of the Republic of Croatia. (2022a). Decision no. Usoz-97/21-6 of 1 March 2022. https://narodne-novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/2022_03_39_489.html. Accessed: 11.6.2023.
     Google Scholar
  10. High Administrative Court of the Republic of Croatia. (2022b). Decision no. Usoz-120/21-4 of 1 March 2022. https://narodne-novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/2022_04_41_517.html. Accessed: 11.6.2023.
     Google Scholar
  11. High Administrative Court of the Republic of Croatia. (2022c). Decision no. Usoz-121/21-4 of 1 ožujka 2022. https://narodne-novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/2022_04_44_556.html. Accessed: 11.6.2023.
     Google Scholar
  12. High Administrative Court of the Republic of Croatia. (2022d). Decision no. Usoz-141/2021-6, Usoz-141/21-8 (surj.-Usoz-3/2022-3 i 75/2022-7) of 5 July 2022. https://narodne-novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/2022_08_89_1386.html. Accessed: 11.6.2023.
     Google Scholar
  13. High Administrative Court of the Republic of Croatia. (2022e). Decision no. Usoz-81/22-8 of 26 September 2022. https://narodne-novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/2022_10_125_1912.html. Accessed: 11.6.2023.
     Google Scholar
  14. High Administrative Court of the Republic of Croatia. (2022f). Decision no. Usoz-95/22-8 of 26 September 2022. https://narodne-novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/2022_10_124_1902.html. Accessed: 11.6.2023.
     Google Scholar
  15. High Administrative Court of the Republic of Croatia. (2022g). Decision no. Usoz-122/21-7 of October 24 2022. https://narodne-novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/2022_11_130_1966.html. Accessed: 11.6.2023.
     Google Scholar
  16. High Administrative Court of the Republic of Croatia. (2022h). Decision no. Usoz-119/21-7 of 24 listopada 2022. https://narodne-novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/2022_11_134_2032.html. Accessed: 11.6.2023.
     Google Scholar
  17. High Administrative Court of the Republic of Croatia. (2023). Decision no. Usoz-31/22-6 of January 30 2023. https://narodne-novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/2023_02_17_300.html. Accessed: 11.6.2023.
     Google Scholar
  18. Information Officer. (2023) Decision no. 26 PPI-4/2023-2 of April 24 2023.
     Google Scholar
  19. Koprić, I. & Klarić, M. (2015). New developments in local democracy in Croatia. Hrvatska i komparativna javna uprava, 15(2), 389–414.
     Google Scholar
  20. Koprić, I. & Manojlović, R. (2013). Participacija građana u lokalnoj samoupravi - nova hrvatska pravna regulacija i neka komparativna iskustva [Citizen Participation in Local Self-government - New Croatian Legal Regulation and some Comparative Experiences]. In B. Davitkovski (Ed.), Četvrti Skopsko-zagrebački pravni kolokvij: Zbornik radova / Четврти Скопско-Загрепски колоквиум: Зборник на трудови (pp. 9–35). Правен факултет „Јустинијан Први“. www.pravo.unizg.hr/_download/repository/IKopric%2C_RManojlovic_-_Participacija_gradjana_u_lokalnoj_samoupravi.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  21. Local and Regional Self-Government Act. (2001). Official Gazette no. 33/01, 60/01, 129/05, 109/07, 125/08, 36/09, 36/09, 150/11, 144/12, 19/13, 137/15, 123/17, 98/19, 144/20.
     Google Scholar
  22. Ljubanović, B. & Britvić Vetma, B. (2020). Sustav eSPIS u funkciji efikasnog djelovanja upravnih i sudskih tijela [E-files system (eSPIS) as a mean of effective operation of the administrative authorities and courts]. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci, 41(1), 313–326.
     Google Scholar
  23. Perić, B. (1983). Struktura prava [The structure of law]. Pravni fakultet u Zagrebu.
     Google Scholar
  24. Right to Access to Information Act. (2013). Official Gazette no. 25/13, 85/15, 69/22.
     Google Scholar
  25. Structure and Scope of State Administration Bodies Act. (2020). Official Gazette no. 85/20, 21/23.
     Google Scholar
  26. Struić, G. (2022). E-savjetovanje u lokalnoj i područnoj (regionalnoj) samoupravi: Uređenje, izazovi i perspektive [E-consultation in local and regional self- government: regulation, challenges and perspectives]. In Ž. Sudarić, I. Belaj & S. Stojanović (Eds.), Zbornik radova 12. međunarodne konferencije "Razvoj javne uprave" (pp. 260–271). Veleučilište „Lavoslav Ružička“. https://www.vevu.hr/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Zbornik-radova-RJU-2022_za-objavu.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  27. Visković, N. (2006). Teorija države i prava [Theory of the state and law]. Birotehnika.
     Google Scholar
  28. Vrban, D. (2003). Država i pravo [State and law]. Golden Marketing.
     Google Scholar