##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

It is a fallacy to believe that democracy originated in Ancient Greece, it wasn’t truly democratic by todays’ standards, however it was something that philosophers and thinkers of the enlightenment could hark back upon to deliver us the modern concept of western democracy. Indeed, it is a western democracy only and not a true world democracy that it should be, it failed to consider the democratic traditions that have existed all across human civilizations past and present, Institutions that have existed through millennia and continue to do so. The thinkers of western Europe used the romantic ideas of Greek democracy and tried to create an alternative to the despotic monarchies that existed at that time in Europe, but all they managed to do was substitute heredity with elections, the power institutions of the government as they were during the reign of monarchs continue to remain bureaucratic and powerful.

This paper tries to examine the alternative institutional structure of Panchayats by looking at the cases of two Pani Panchayats, one Van Panchayat, one Kashtkari Panchayat and the Khap Panchayats of North West India; how they have evolved historically, and how and why are they socially embedded creating a natural basis for establishing direct democracy at the grassroots level. Upon the investigation of the above cases, it is found that not only do Panchayats divide and decentralise the exercise of power, but it also provides indigenous institutional legitimacy to such exercise. It enhances the participation of not just all, but more specifically the participation of the marginalised sections of the society (women and untouchables) in their local decision-making processes. The examination of the Khap Panchayats and their historical evolution also points to the fact that social institution of Panchayats is not perfect, and they require rationalised restructuring in order to achieve its goal of establishing truly democratic institution at the grassroots level. Finally concluding that a socially embedded democratic institution like the Panchayat in India that has evolved with the society itself is a more suitable democratic institution, which can form the basis of a truly responsible democratic government.

References

  1. Acemoglu, D., Verdier, T., & Robinson, J. A. (2004). Kleptocracy and divide‐and‐rule: a model of personal rule. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2(2‐3), 162-192.
     Google Scholar
  2. Alok, V. N. (2011). Role of panchayat bodies in rural development since 1959. Theme Paper for the 55th Annual Members’Conference: Published by Indian Institute of Public Administration, New Delhi.
     Google Scholar
  3. Alsop, R., Krishna, A., & Sjoblom, D. (2001). Inclusion and Local Elected Governments: The Panchayat Raj System in India. Social Development Paper, 37.
     Google Scholar
  4. Ash, E., Morelli, M., & Van Weelden, R. (2017). Elections and divisiveness: Theory and evidence. The Journal of Politics, 79(4), 1268-1285.
     Google Scholar
  5. Benjamin, S. (2008). Occupancy urbanism: Radicalizing politics and economy beyond policy and programs. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(3), 719-729.
     Google Scholar
  6. Bharadwaj, S. B. (2012). Myth and Reality of the Khap Panchayats: A Historical Analysis of the Panchayat and Khap Panchayat. Studies in History, 28(1), 43-67.
     Google Scholar
  7. Chikarmane, P., & Narayan, L. (2005). Organising the Unorganised: A Case Study of the Kagad Kach Patra Kashtakari Panchayat (Trade Union of Waste-pickers). Pune: KKPKP.
     Google Scholar
  8. Chowdhry, P. (2004). Caste panchayats and the policing of marriage in Haryana: Enforcing kinship and territorial exogamy. Contributions to Indian Sociology, 38(1-2), 1-42.
     Google Scholar
  9. Confino, A. (1997). Collective memory and cultural history: Problems of method. The American historical review, 102(5), 1386-1403.
     Google Scholar
  10. Deshpande, R. S., & Reddy, V. R. (1990). Social Dynamics and Farmers' Society: A case Study of Pani Panchayat. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 45(902-2018-2778), 355-361.
     Google Scholar
  11. Dhagamwar, V. (2009). Panch Parmeshwar. Economic and Political Weekly, 13-16.
     Google Scholar
  12. Donovan, T., & Bowler, S. (1998). Direct democracy and minority rights: an extension. American Journal of Political Science, 1020-1024.
     Google Scholar
  13. Graeber, D. (2013). The democracy project: A history, a crisis, a movement. Spiegel & Grau.
     Google Scholar
  14. Heimsath, C. H. (2015). Indian nationalism and Hindu social reform. Princeton University Press.
     Google Scholar
  15. Henrich, J. (2011). Chapter 9: The birth of high gods how the cultural evolution of supernatural policing influenced the emergence of complex, cooperative human societies. In: Scaller et al. (eds) Evolution, culture, and the human mind, page 119. Psychology Press.
     Google Scholar
  16. Höllinger, F., & Haller, M. (1990). Kinship and social networks in modern societies: A cross-cultural comparison among seven nations. European Sociological Review, 6(2), 103-124.
     Google Scholar
  17. Israel, J. (2009). A revolution of the mind: Radical enlightenment and the intellectual origins of modern democracy. Princeton University Press.
     Google Scholar
  18. Jain, D. (1996). Panchayat raj: Women changing governance. New York: UNDP.
     Google Scholar
  19. Jodhka, S. S. (2002). Caste and untouchability in rural Punjab. Economic and Political Weekly, 1813-1823.
     Google Scholar
  20. Jones, A. J., & Sergot, M. (1996). A formal characterisation of institutionalised power. Logic Journal of the IGPL, 4(3), 427-443.
     Google Scholar
  21. Mair, P. (2002). Populist Democracy vs Party Democracy. In: Mény, Y., Surel, Y. (eds) Democracies and the Populist Challenge. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403920072_5.
     Google Scholar
  22. Mathew, G. (1995). Status of Panchayati Raj in the States of India. Concept publishing company.
     Google Scholar
  23. Meschievitz, C. S., & Galanter, M. (1982). In search of Nyaya Panchayats: The politics of a moribund institution. In Comparative Studies (pp. 47-77). Academic Press.
     Google Scholar
  24. Muhlberger, S., & Paine, P. (1993). Democracy's place in world history. Journal of World History, 23-45.
     Google Scholar
  25. Negi, B. S., Chauhan, D. S., & Todaria, N. P. (2008). Comparative plant diversity between panchayat and adjoining reserve forests in Garhwal Himalaya. Indian Journal of Forestry, 31(4), 585-593.
     Google Scholar
  26. Nora, P. (1989). Between memory and history: Les lieux de mémoire. representations, 7-24.
     Google Scholar
  27. Ostrom, E., Burger, J., Field, C. B., Norgaard, R. B., & Policansky, D. (1999). Revisiting the commons: local lessons, global challenges. science, 284(5412), 278-282.
     Google Scholar
  28. Rao, M. G., & Singh, N. (2014). Chapter 10: Asymmetric Federalism in India. In: Bird, R M. (eds) Fiscal fragmentation in decentralized countries. page 295. Edward Elgar Publishing.
     Google Scholar
  29. Sahu, B. K. (2008). Pani Panchayat in Orissa, India: The practice of participatory water management. Development, 51(1), 121-125.
     Google Scholar
  30. Singh, H. (1994). Constitutional Base for Panchayati Raj in India: The 73rd Amendment Act. Asian Survey, 34(9), 818-827.
     Google Scholar
  31. Sinha, J. B. (2012). Cultural roots of Indian mindset. The Social Engineer, 13(1-2), 6-21.
     Google Scholar
  32. Yadav, B. (2009). Khap panchayats: Stealing freedom?. Economic and Political Weekly, 16-19.
     Google Scholar