Patent Rights in the Sports Industry
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
A trademark is a distinctive sign that identifies certain goods or services produced or provided by an individual or a company and distinguishes same from others. Trade mark is a symbol or sign which differentiates the goods and services of one business from another one although they may operate in horizontal business within or without the same community. Trademark is an indicative medium relied upon by consumers to create an imaginary link between a product on which such mark is used and its seller. Its major hallmark is its ability to differentiate the goods of one seller from those of others in the same line of business from one. Trademark in Nigeria is governed by the Trade Marks Act, Cap T 13, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 2004 (hereinafter referred to as Trademark Act) and the Trademark Regulations 1990. In contributing to existing literature, the paper examines the economic aspect of mark registration in the sports industry. It examines registrable marks and identifies the possibility of registration under existing treatises globally. The paper concludes with salient recommendations toward harnessing the economic aspect of trade mark registration in the Nigerian sports industry.
References
-
Allmanna Suenska Elektriska A/B v. The Burntisland Shipbuilding Co. Ltd (1951). 68 RPC 63 at 69.
Google Scholar
1
-
An Overview of Patent Laws in Nigeria. (2020). http://www.nigerianlawguru.com/articles/intellectual%20property%20law/AN%20OVERVIEW%20OF%20THE%20LAW%20OF%20PATENTS%20IN%20NIGERIA.pdf accessed 25/11/2020 at 13:30pm.
Google Scholar
2
-
Bambauer, D. (2005). Legal Responses to the Challenges of Sports Patents. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 18(2).
Google Scholar
3
-
Das, P.K. (2000). Offensive Protection: The Potential Application of Intellectual Property Law to Scripted Sports Plays. Indiana Law Journal, 75(3).
Google Scholar
4
-
García, G. R. (2011). He Shoots, He Scores…and Receives Copyright Protection? How the Current State of Intellectual Property Law Fumbles with Sports. U. Denv. Sports & Ent. L.J., 81. https://www.law.du.edu/documents/sports-and-entertainment-law-journal/issues/11/Garcia-FINAL-Online-Version.pdf> Accessed 1/12/2020 at 10:14am.
Google Scholar
5
-
Genentech Inc. (1989). Patent R.P.C. 147 C.A.
Google Scholar
6
-
Hills v. Evans (1860). 31 LJ. Ch. 457 at 463.
Google Scholar
7
-
Kukkonen, C. A. (2003). Be a Good Sport and Refrain from Using my Patented Putt: Intellectual Property Protection for Sports Related Movements. Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society.
Google Scholar
8
-
Latella, F.A. (2001). Method of swing training for sports. U.S. Patent No. 6,176,790. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Google Scholar
9
-
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. and another v. N. H. Norton & CO. LTD. (1994). Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases, 111(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/1994rpc1.
Google Scholar
10
-
Miller, D. D. (1997). Method of putting. U.S. Patent No. 5,616,089. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Google Scholar
11
-
Patents and Designs Act of 1970, Chapter 344of Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 1990. (1990). http://www.commonlii.org/ng/legis/num_act/pada195/.
Google Scholar
12
-
Ryan, N., Yates, L., House, T. R. (1997). Training apparatus, method for training an athlete, and method for producing a training device. U.S. Patent No. 5,639,243. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Google Scholar
13
-
P.C.G. Research Ltd. v. Ardon International (1993) FSR 197 at 218.
Google Scholar
14
-
Savage v. Harris & Sons. (1896). 13 RPC 364 at 370.
Google Scholar
15
-
Schwarz, L. (2001). Fitness method. U.S. Patent No. 6,190,291. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Google Scholar
16
-
Technograph Printed Circuits Ltd. v. Mills & Rockley (Electronics) Ltd (1972). R.P.C. 346.
Google Scholar
17