##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

A trademark is a mark used in relation to goods for trade in Nigeria. It could be a device, brand, heading, label, name, signature, word, letter, or a combination thereof (Trade Marks Act, Cap. T13 s. 67(1), Laws of the Federation of Nigeria (LFN), 2004). For a mark to be beneficial to the owner under the Law and have proprietary interest, it must be registered.  It could be registered in part A or Part B of the trademarks register (Trade Marks Act, Ss. 9(1) and 10(1)). Not all marks can be registered under the Law, hence there are registrable and non-registrable marks under the Trade Marks Act. The owner of a Registered trademark has the exclusive right to the use of that trademark in respect of the goods in which it is registered (Procter and Gamble Co. v. Global Soap and Co. Ltd.& Anor, (2013)). It is my recommendation that all marks used in trade should be registered so that the owner will reap from the fruit of his labor by having a monopoly right and action in infringement.

References

  1. Agreement on Trade-related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS). (1995).
     Google Scholar
  2. Babafemi, F.O. (2006). Intellectual Property. Ibadan: Justinian Books Ltd.
     Google Scholar
  3. Bainbridge, D. (1999). Intellectual Property. Pearson Education Ltd.
     Google Scholar
  4. Bell Sons & Co. v Godwin Aka & Anor. (1972). 3 UILR (pt. 1) 42.
     Google Scholar
  5. Curzon (ed) (1988). Dictionary of Law (3rd ed.). London: Pitman Publishing.
     Google Scholar
  6. Ducker’s Trade Mark. (1928). 45 RPC 397.
     Google Scholar
  7. Dyktrade Ltd.V. Omnia Nig Ltd. (2000). LPELR–977 Sc.
     Google Scholar
  8. Eastern Photographic Materials Co. v. Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks. (1898). AC 571 at 585.
     Google Scholar
  9. Frodo Ltd.V.Ibeto Industry Ltd. (1999). 2 NWLR (pt. 592) 510.
     Google Scholar
  10. I can’t believe it’s Yoghurt Trade Mark. (1992). RPC 533.
     Google Scholar
  11. ‘Jerry-Lynn’ T M. (1999). FSR 491.
     Google Scholar
  12. Lactel Trade Mark. (1994). RPC 37.
     Google Scholar
  13. Leeds, D. (1955). Confusion and consumer Psychology. Journal of Patent Office Society, 894. https//heinonline.org, accessed 29/10/2022.
     Google Scholar
  14. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Ltd.v. Registrar of Trade Marks. (1969) ALL NLR 540.
     Google Scholar
  15. Macfoy Ltd. v. Davis Corporation. (1956). CLR, 190.
     Google Scholar
  16. Martin, E.A and Law, J. (eds) (2006). Oxford Dictionary of Law New York: Oxford University Press.
     Google Scholar
  17. Moorgate Tobacco Co. Ltd.v. Philip Moris. (1984). 59 ALJR 77.
     Google Scholar
  18. Nathan, D. (2011). The role of trademark lawyer in branding decisions. http//avvo.com, accessed 17/8/2022.
     Google Scholar
  19. Neutrogena Corp v. Golden Ltd., (1996). RPC 473; Swiss Miss Trade Mark (1997). RPC 219.
     Google Scholar
  20. Oyewunmi, A.O. (2015). Nigerian Law of Intellectual Property. Lagos: University of Lagos Press.
     Google Scholar
  21. Phillpart v. Witeley Ltd., (1908). 25 RPC 40.
     Google Scholar
  22. Procter and Gamble Co. v. Global Soap and Co. Ltd.& Anor. (2013). 1 NWLR Pt 1336
     Google Scholar
  23. PZ v. Chami. (1971). 2 NCLR, 376.
     Google Scholar
  24. Re Application by Glenlieth Holdings Ltd. (1989) 15 TRP 558.
     Google Scholar
  25. Standard Cameras Ltd. Application. (1952). 69 RPC, David, p. 530.
     Google Scholar
  26. Tarzan Trade Mark, (1970) RPC 450.
     Google Scholar
  27. Trade Marks Act, Cap. T13, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria (LFN) (2004).
     Google Scholar
  28. York Trailor Holdings Ltd.v. Registrar of Trade Marks. (1982). FSR 111.
     Google Scholar