Opportunity Found: Exploring the Success and Prospect of the Turkey-Africa Cooperation



Abstract Views
397

Downloads
322

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Nov 18, 2022
Published Dec 20, 2022
10.24018/ejpolitics.2022.1.5.49

Abstract viewed = 397 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Ankara views the breakdown of accession talks with the European Union as a fracture of its ambivalent perspective and its distrust of Western powers. As a result, it is reorienting itself toward Africa as an option within the anarchic structure of the international system to realize its regional and global ambitions. This research article argues that the shift in power dynamics in the international system from a realist framework and the increasing role of domestic structural factors and actors as part of the normative underpinnings of a liberal framework explain Turkey-Africa cooperation. The author examines the success and potential of this cooperation and concludes that the Turkey-Africa opening is undoubtedly mutually beneficial if strengthened. It also potentially positions Turkey as an effective Western ally in a potential East-West rivalry.

Keywords: foreign policy, international politics, soft power, Turkey-Africa.

References

  1. Adelman, C. C. (2003). The privatization of foreign aid. Foreign Affairs, 82(6), 9.
     Google Scholar
  2. Adem, A. (2022). Third Turkey-Africa partnership summit delivers 'win-win' agreements. African Business. Available at: https://african.business/2021/12/trade-investment/turkey-africa-partnership-summit-set-for-17-18-december/. (Viewed October 22, 2022).
     Google Scholar
  3. Ahmet, K. (2005). Africa report, strategic report No: 4. Istanbul: TASAM Publications. pp. 7–18.
     Google Scholar
  4. Aktaran, A. I. (2012). Africa opening in Turkish foreign policy. Middle East Analysis, 4(46), 17.
     Google Scholar
  5. Akturk, S. (2019). Five faces of Russia’s soft power: far left, far right, orthodox christian, Russophone, and ethnoreligious networks Ponars Euarasia-policy Memo N. 623, November. Available at https:// www.ponarseurasia.org/sites/default/files/policy-memos-pdf/Pepm623_Akturk_Nov2019_1.pdf. (Viewed on October 22, 2022)
     Google Scholar
  6. Alexis, H & Oğuzlu, T. (2014). Engagement with Africa: making sense of Turkey’s approach in the context of growing east-west rivalry. Uluslararası İlişkiler, 11(41 (Spring 2014)), p. 65–85.
     Google Scholar
  7. Al-Suwaidani, H.M.T & Ahmed, H.H (2019). Turkish policy towards Africa in the era of the justice and development party. Journal of College of Education for Women, 30(4), 153–165.
     Google Scholar
  8. Babacan, A. (2008). Global trends and Turkish foreign policy, opening statement at the ambassador’s conference. Bilkent Hotel and Conference Center, Ankara, 15 July 2008. Available at https://www.mfa.gov.tr/disisleri-bakani-ali-babacan_in-buyukelciler-konferansi-acis-konusmasi.tr.mfa. (Viewed on October 22, 2022).
     Google Scholar
  9. Baç, M.M (2020). Turkey’s grand strategy in the context of global and regional challenges. Perceptions, XXV (2), 178–202.
     Google Scholar
  10. Bamigboye, O.M (2022). Africa as part of Turkey’s grand strategy. [Unpublished Research Paper for the Turkish Foreign Policy Course, Isik University]. Istanbul, Turkey.
     Google Scholar
  11. Beasley, R. K. (2013). Foreign policy in comparative perspective: domestic and international influences on state behavior. Thousand Oaks, Calif: C.Q. Press. p.115.
     Google Scholar
  12. Boix, C. (1998). Political parties, growth, and equality: conservative and social democratic economic strategies in the world economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
     Google Scholar
  13. Boix, C. (2011). Democracy, development, and the international system. American Political Science Review, 105(4), 809–28.
     Google Scholar
  14. Carr, E. H. (1941). The Twenty years crisis: 1919–1939. London, England: MacMillan.
     Google Scholar
  15. Cerny, P.G (1995). Globalization and the changing logic of collective action. International Organization, 49(4), 595–625.
     Google Scholar
  16. Chaudoin, S., Milner, H. V., & Pang, X. (2015). International systems and domestic politics: linking complex interactions with empirical models in international relations. International Organization, 69(2), 275–309. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24758116.
     Google Scholar
  17. China-Africa Business Council (2021). Chinese investment in Africa. (Author) Available at http://www.focac.org/eng/lhyj_1/yjcg/202108/P020210912686220025483.pdf, (viewed on October 22, 2022).
     Google Scholar
  18. Cooper, A. F., & Flemes D. (2013). Foreign policy strategies of emerging powers in a multipolar world: an introductory review. Third World Quarterly, 34(6), 943–962. Available athttp://www.jstor.org/stable/42002169.
     Google Scholar
  19. Davutoğlu, A., & SAM (Center). (2012). Principles of Turkish foreign policy and regional political structuring. SAM (Center), Stratejik Araştırmalar Merkezi & Republic of Turkey Ministry of Foreign Affairs Center for Strategic Research.
     Google Scholar
  20. Dyer, G. & Anderlini J. (2011). China’s lending hits new heights. Financial Times.
     Google Scholar
  21. Easton, D. (1965). A framework for political analysis Englewood cliffs. N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
     Google Scholar
  22. Eyrice, E. (2015). What is Turkey doing in Africa? African opening in Turkish foreign policy. Research Turkey, 4 (4), 95–106. Centre for Policy and Research on Turkey, London.
     Google Scholar
  23. Fontaine, R & Daniel M. K, (2013). International order and global swing states. The Washington Quarterly, 36(1), 93–109, 101–2.
     Google Scholar
  24. Frieden, J.A., & Rogowski, R (1996). The impact of the international economy on national policies: an analytical overview. In internationalization and domestic politics, Edited by Robert O. Keohane and Helen V. Milner, 25^t7. New York: Cambridge University Press.
     Google Scholar
  25. Gideon, R (1998). Review: neoclassical realism and theories of foreign policy. World Politics, 51(1), 144–172. Available on http://www.jstor.org/stable/25054068.
     Google Scholar
  26. Gourevitch, P (1978). The second image reversed: the international sources of domestic politics. International Organization, 32 (4), 881–9.
     Google Scholar
  27. Hakura, F. S. & Royal Institute of International Affairs. (2011) Turkey and the Middle East: Internal Confidence, external assertiveness. London: Chatham House Handbook of International Relations, London: Sage.
     Google Scholar
  28. Haufler, V (2004). International diplomacy and the privatization of conflict prevention. International Studies Perspectives, 5(2), 158–163.
     Google Scholar
  29. Hazar, N. (2000). The future of Turkish–African relations. Dis Politika-Foreign Policy, 25(3–4), 107.
     Google Scholar
  30. Hermann, C. F. (1990). Changing course: when governments choose to redirect foreign policy. International Studies Quarterly, 34(1), 3–21.
     Google Scholar
  31. Jackson, R., Sørensen, G & Møller, J (2018). Liberalism. 10.1093/hepl/9780198803577.003.0004. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343734211_4_Liberalism. (Viewed on October 22, 2022).
     Google Scholar
  32. Jervis, R. (1997). System effects: complexity in political and social life. Princeton. NJ: Princeton University Press.
     Google Scholar
  33. Jia W. (2016). Intercultural communication: adapting to emerging global realities (first). Cognella Academic Publishing.
     Google Scholar
  34. Kalaitzidis, A. & Athens Institute for Education and Research (AIER), (2009). Global politics in the dawn of the 21st century, Athens. Greece: Athens Institute for Education and Research.
     Google Scholar
  35. Karaca, S. Z. (2000). Turkish foreign policy in the year 2000 and beyond: her opening-up policy to Africa. Dis Politika-Foreign Policy, 25(3–4), 115–119.
     Google Scholar
  36. Karlsson, I. (2009). Turkey in Europe but Not of Europe? Tesev Foreign Policy Program, Lund University, Centre for European Studies Joint Report.
     Google Scholar
  37. Kayser, M.A. (2007). How domestic is domestic politics? Globalization and Elections. Annual Review of Political Science, 10 (1):341–62.
     Google Scholar
  38. Keyman E. F. (2009). Globalization, modernity, and democracy: In search of a viable domestic polity for a sustainable Turkish foreign policy. Perceptions, Autumn-Winter 2010, XV (3–4), 1–20.
     Google Scholar
  39. Kilinç, R. (2009). Turkey and the alliance of civilizations: norm adoption as a survival strategy. Insight Turkey, 11, 3.
     Google Scholar
  40. Kirişçi, K. (2006). Turkey’s foreign policy in turbulent times. Chaillot Paper 92. ISS Paris. 7.
     Google Scholar
  41. Kirişçi, K. (2009). The transformation of Turkish foreign policy: The rise of the trading state. New Perspectives on Turkey, 40, 29–56. Doi: 10.1017/S0896634600005203.
     Google Scholar
  42. Kitschelt, H, Peter, L, Gary, M, and John S (1999). Continuity and change in contemporary capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
     Google Scholar
  43. Kliman, D.M & Fontaine, R (2012). Global swing states Brazil, India, Indonesia, Turkey, and the future of international order. Washington: Centre for New American Security.
     Google Scholar
  44. Kliman, D; Fontaine, R (2012). Turkey: A global swing state. German Marshall Fund. Policy Brief, April 13, 2012.
     Google Scholar
  45. Kohler, M., Holt, P. M., & Hirschler, K. (2013). Alliances and treaties between Frankish and Muslim rulers in the middle east: cross-cultural diplomacy in the period of the crusade. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill, NV.
     Google Scholar
  46. Kramer, H (2000). A changing Turkey: The challenge to Europe and the United States. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.
     Google Scholar
  47. Kuniholm, B. R. (1991). Turkey and the West. Foreign Affairs, 70(2), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.2307/20044708.
     Google Scholar
  48. Larrabee, F. S. & Lesser I. O. (2003). Turkish foreign policy in an age of uncertainty. Pittsburgh, RAND. p.35.
     Google Scholar
  49. Levy, J.S (2002). War and Peace. In Carlsnaes, Walter. Foreign Policy. Handbook of International Relations. 2002. SAGE Publications. 28 Feb. 2011.
     Google Scholar
  50. Mearsheimer, J. J (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
     Google Scholar
  51. Mehmet Ö. & Akgün, B. (2010). Turkey’s opening to Africa. Journal of Modern African Studies, 48 (4), 533.
     Google Scholar
  52. Mesfin, B (2009). The establishment and implications of the United States Africa command: an African perspective. ISS Paper 183.
     Google Scholar
  53. Montgomery, A. E. (1972). The making of the treaty of sevres of August 10, 1920. The Historical Journal, 15(4), 775–787. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2638042.
     Google Scholar
  54. Morgan, P. (2013). Security in international politics: traditional approaches in contemporary security studies. Edited by Alan Collins. Oxford, Oxford University Press, ISBN 9780199694778.
     Google Scholar
  55. Morgenthau, H. (1978). Six principles of realism, politics among nations: the struggle for power and place. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
     Google Scholar
  56. Mosley, L (2003). Global capital and national governments. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
     Google Scholar
  57. Moyo, D (2012). Beijing, a Boon for Africa. New York Times, June 28, 2012.
     Google Scholar
  58. Moyo, D (2012). Winner takes all: China’s race for resources and what it means for the world. New York, Basic Books, 2012.
     Google Scholar
  59. Nye, J. (2017). Soft power: the origins and political progress of a concept. Palgrave Communications. 3:17008 DOI: 10.1057/palcomms.2017.8.
     Google Scholar
  60. Nye, J. S (2008). Public diplomacy and soft power. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 94.
     Google Scholar
  61. Nye, J. (2011). The Future of Power. New York, NY: Public Affairs.
     Google Scholar
  62. Oatley, T (2011). The reductionist gamble: open economy politics in the global economy. International Organization, 65(2), 311.
     Google Scholar
  63. Ozkan, M. (2010). What Drives Turkey’s Involvement in Africa? Review of African Political Economy, 37(126), 533–540. DOI: 10.1080/03056244.2010.530952.
     Google Scholar
  64. Ozkan, M. (2011). Turkey’s ‘new’ engagements in Africa and Asia: scope, content, and implications. Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs, XVI (3), 115–137.
     Google Scholar
  65. Peker, E. & Nishizawa, K (2012). China, turkey sign $1.6 billion, three-year yuan-lira currency swap accord. Bloomberg.
     Google Scholar
  66. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2017). Turkey and the African Union. Available at https://www.mfa.gov.tr/turkey-and-the-african-union.en.mfa. (Viewed on October 22, 2022).
     Google Scholar
  67. Rudincová, K (2014). New player on the scene: Turkish engagement in Africa. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, 25,197–213. Available at https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=28261. (Viewed on October 22, 2022)
     Google Scholar
  68. Saatçioğlu, B & Tekin, F (Eds), (2021) Turkey and The European Union. Key Dynamics and Future Scenarios. Nomos, Baden-Baden.
     Google Scholar
  69. Savas G. & Oguzhan T. (2014). Turkey’s increased engagement in Africa: The potential, limits, and future perspective of relations. European Journal of Economic and Political Studies, 7 (2014) 87–115.
     Google Scholar
  70. Terhemba D, (2021). Buhari Departs Abuja for Turkey-Africa. Summit in Istanbul. The Guardian, available at https://guardian.ng/news/buhari-departs-abuja-for-turkey-africa-summit-in-istanbul/. (Viewed on October 22, 2022).
     Google Scholar
  71. Tihanyi, L., Banalieva, E.R.., Devinney, T. M., & Pedersen, T., (Ed.) (2015). Emerging economies and multinational enterprises. Advances in international management. p. 28. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, https://doi.org/10.1108/S1571-502720150000028030.
     Google Scholar
  72. TRT World (2021) Turkey’s state-funded scholarship program is in great demand worldwide. Available at https://www.trtworld.com/turkey/turkey-s-state-funded-scholarship-program-is-in-great-demand-worldwide-49095. (Viewed on October 22, 2022).
     Google Scholar
  73. The Turkish Peace Treaty: official text of terms imposed on turkey by the allies in the treaty of Sevres. (1921). Current History (1916–1940), 13(1), 164–184. http://www.jstor.org/stable/45329089.
     Google Scholar
  74. Walker, W. J. (2011). Introduction: the sources of Turkish grand strategy “strategic depth” and “zero- problems” in context. LSE Ideas: Turkey’s Global Strategy, London School of Economics and Political Science: London.
     Google Scholar
  75. Waltz, K. N. (2000). Structural realism after the cold war. International Security, 25(1), 5–41. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2626772.
     Google Scholar
  76. Waltz, K. (2010). Theory of international politics. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
     Google Scholar
  77. Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
     Google Scholar
  78. Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
     Google Scholar
  79. Wheeler, T. (2011). Ankara to Africa: Turkey’s outreach since 2005. South African Journal of International Affairs, 18(1), 43–62. DOI: 10.1080/10220461.2011.564426.
     Google Scholar
  80. Yel, A. M. (2009). A healthy and democratic civil-military relationship in Turkey: accountability of both entities. European Journal of Economic and Political Studies, 2, 1.
     Google Scholar
  81. Yilmaz, H. (2008). Euroscepticism in Turkey: parties, elites, and public opinion. 1995-2006. South European Society and Politics, 13(4), 19.
     Google Scholar
  82. Yilmaz, K. (2009). The emergence and rise of conservative elite in Turkey. Insight Turkey, 11(2), 113–136. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26331177.
     Google Scholar
  83. Zamzam Foundation (2010). Turkey’s eye care campaign in Africa. Periodical Humanitarian Newsletter, 1(1), 1–2.
     Google Scholar