The Good Faith of the Parties in Buying and Selling Goods Online with Cash on Delivery (COD) Payment: A Critical Analysis



Abstract Views
310

Downloads
231

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Dec 22, 2022
Published Jan 25, 2023
10.24018/ejpolitics.2023.2.1.59

Abstract viewed = 310 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

This paper explores the good faith of the parties through the Cash on Delivery (COD) payment method, which is a payment system method done at the destination place. Good faith is basically a universal principle that emphasizes the responsibility and honesty of the parties in conducting transactions. The parties involved in buying and selling online through COD payment are based on good faith. In purchasing with COD, the parties (seller, buyer, marketplace, expedition service, and courier) must fulfill their respective obligations honestly as a form of the implementation of good faith. The implementation of the principle of good faith by the parties will certainly give confidence to each party so that it has an impact on the development of buying and selling online with the COD payment method.

Keywords: buy-sell cash on delivery good faith

References

  1. Adnyani, Putu Sri Bintang Sidhi, I. M. S. (2021). Akibat hukum wanprestasi dalam transaksi online dengan metode cash on delivery Pada Aplikasi Shopee [Legal consequences of default in online transactions using the cash on delivery method of the Shopee Application] Jurnal Kertha Semaya, 9(9), 1532–1543. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24843/KS.2021.v09.i09.p04.
     Google Scholar
  2. Ainiah, Z., & Santoso, L. (2018). Implikasi Asas Itikad Baik dalam Akad Murabahah di Perbankan Syariah. [Implications of the Principles of Good Faith in Murabahah Contracts in Islamic Banking] An-Nisbah: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah, 4(2), 73–98. https://doi.org/10.21274/an.2018.4.2.73-98.
     Google Scholar
  3. Chumaida, Z. V. (2014). Prinsip Itikad Baik dalam Perjanjian Asuransi Yang Berkeadilan. [The Principle of Good Faith in Fair Insurance Agreements]. Bandung: PT Revka Petra Media.
     Google Scholar
  4. Desiani, A., Amirulloh, M., & Suwandono, A. (2019). Implementasi Asas Itikad Baik dalam Perlindungan Konsumen atas Pembatalan Transaksi yang Dilakukan oleh Situs Belanja Elektronik [Implementation of Good Faith Principles in Consumer Protection for Cancellation of Transactions Conducted by Electronic Shopping Sites]. Acta Diurnal: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan dan Ke-PPAT-An, 2(1), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.24198/acta.v2i1.157.
     Google Scholar
  5. Halaweh, M. (2018). Cash on delivery (COD) As an alternative payment method for e-commerce transactions: analysis and implications. International Journal of Sociotechnology and Knowledge Development, 10(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSKD.2018100101.
     Google Scholar
  6. Haryanti, T. (2021). Itikad Baik dalam Perjanjian Jual Beli dengan Metode Pembayaran Cash On Delivery [Good Faith in the Sale and Purchase Agreement with the cash on delivery payment method]. Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum, 8(2), 160–173. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.31289/jiph.v8i2.5126.
     Google Scholar
  7. Herman, J. V., & Kansil, C. S. T. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Pengguna Marketplace Terhadap Dugaan Pelanggaran Hak Pribadi yang Dilakukan Jasa Pengiriman Berdasarkan Hukum Positif Di Indonesia (Contoh Kasus Viral Transaksi Jual Beli “Cash On Delivery”) [Legal Protection for Marketplace Users Against Alleged Violation of Personal Rights by Delivery Services Based on Positive Law in Indonesia (Example of viral cases of sale and purchase transactions "Cash On Delivery")]. Jurnal Hukum Adigama, 4(2), 2739–2763. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24912/adigama.v4i2.17769.
     Google Scholar
  8. Innaka, A., Rusdiana, S., & Sularto. (2012). Penerapan Asas Itikad Baik Tahap Prakontraktual pada Perjanjian Jual Beli Perumahan. [Application of the Principle of Good Faith in the Precontractual Stage in the Housing Sale and Purchase Agreement]. Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 24(3), 504–514. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16122.
     Google Scholar
  9. Iskandar, D. S., & Rahardja, S. (2021). Pertanggungjawaban Perdata Konsumen Terhadap Pelaku Usaha Jual Beli Online di Marketplace Secara Cash On Delivery (COD) [Consumer civil liability against online buying and selling business actors in the marketplace by cash on delivery (COD)]. Wacana Paramarta: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 20(2), 82–96. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32816/paramarta.v20i2.115.
     Google Scholar
  10. Jasmaniar, J., & Zainuddin, Z. (2022). The urgency of mediator’s good faith in mediating legal disputes: the critical analysis study. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 10(3), 476–488. https://doi.org/10.20473/mi.v1i2.8821.9.
     Google Scholar
  11. Juanda Sitorus. (2021). Kedudukan Barang Bukti Sitaan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Tinjau dari Aspek Keperdataan [Position of confiscated evidence of corruption crimes in view of civil aspects] Journal Equitable, 5(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.37859/jeq.v5i1.2463.
     Google Scholar
  12. Kirana, I., & Ayunda, R. (2021). Sistem Belanja Cash on Delivery (COD) dalam Perspektif Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen dan Transaksi Elektronik [Cash on Delivery (COD) Shopping system in the legal perspective of consumer protection and electronic transactions]. Surya Kencana Satu : Dinamika Masalah Hukum Dan Keadilan, 12(2), 112–125. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.32493/jdmhkdmhk.v13i1.20217.
     Google Scholar
  13. Konsumen, M. (2022). Anteraja Tidak Bertanggung Jawab dan Tidak Mengembalikan Barang Saya yang Dinyatakan Rusak [Anteraja is not responsible and does not return my goods which are declared damaged]. https://mediakonsumen.com/2022/05/28/surat-pembaca/anteraja-tidak-bertanggung-jawab-dan-tidak-mengembalikan-barang-saya-yang-dinyatakan-rusak. Diakses 30 Juni 2022.
     Google Scholar
  14. Koto, I., & Asmadi, E. (2021). Pertanggungjawaban Hukum terhadap Tindakan Malpraktik Tenaga Medis di Rumah Sakit [ Legal Responsibility for malpractice of medical personnel in hospitals]. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi, 4(2), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v4i2.5372.
     Google Scholar
  15. Kunarso, K., & Sumaryanto, A. D. (2020). Eksistensi Perjanjian Ditengah Pandemi Covid-19 [The existence of the agreement in the Covid-19 pandemic era]. Batulis Civil Law Review, 1(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v1i1.423.
     Google Scholar
  16. Lumaris, M. L. C. (2021). Legal efforts of conflicts resolution in the cash on delivery system in e-commerce transactions in Indonesia. International Journal of Social Science And Human Research, 04(09), 2287–2294. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v4-i9-04.
     Google Scholar
  17. Manery, B. D. (2018). Makna dan Fungsi Itikad Baik dalam Kontrak Kerja Konstruksi [Meaning and Function of Good Faith in Construction Work Contracts]. Sasi, 23(2), 136–148. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v23i2.101.
     Google Scholar
  18. Pardede, G. E., & Sujanto, F. (2021). Urgensi Penyeragaman Kebijakan COD Pada Marketplace Indonesia Demi Mewujudkan Perlindungan Hukum [The Urgency of Uniforming COD Policies in the Indonesian Marketplace to Realize Legal Protection] Journal Economic & Business Law Review, 1(2), 12–28. https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/JEBLR/article/view/27731.
     Google Scholar
  19. Priyono, E. A. (2017). Peranan Asas Itikad Baik Dalam Kontrak Baku (Upaya Menjaga Keseimbangan Bagi Para Pihak) [The Role of Good Faith Principles in Standard Contracts (Efforts to Maintain Balance for the Parties)]. Diponegoro Private Law Review, 1(1), 13–22. https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/dplr/article/view/1934/1257.
     Google Scholar
  20. Retnowati, M. S., Rosalina, N. M., Sup, D. F. A., Firdaus, M. I., & Urrosyidin, M. S. (2022). Analisis Asas Itikad Baik dalam Jual Beli Online Berbasis COD (Cash on Delivery) [Analysis of Good Faith Principles in COD-Based Online Buying and Selling (Cash on Delivery)]. Alhamra: Jurnal Studi Islam, 3(1), 10–18. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30595/ajsi.v3i1.11867.
     Google Scholar
  21. Risma, A., & Zainuddin, Z. (2021). Tafsir Pandemi Covid-19 Sebagai Alasan Force Majeure Yang Mengakibatkan Pembatalan Perjanjian [Interpretation of the Covid-19 Pandemic as a Reason for Force Majeure Resulting in the Cancellation of the Agreement]. Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, 5(1), 100–112. https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v5i1.420.
     Google Scholar
  22. Rokfa, A. A., Tanda, A. R. P., Anugraheni, A. D., & Kristanti, W. A. (2022). Penyelesaian Sengketa Sistem Pembayaran Cash on Delivery Pada Media E-Commerce [Dispute Resolution of Cash on Delivery Payment System in E-Commerce Media]. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 6(2), 161–173. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v6i2.533.
     Google Scholar
  23. Silalahi, A. K., Gultom, E., & Suparto, S. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Penjual Pada Transaksi Online Shop Dengan Menggunakan Sistem Pembayaran COD dalam Perspektif Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen [Legal protection for sellers in online shop transactions using the COD Payment System in the Perspective of Consumer Protection Law]. JUSTITIA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Humaniora, 9(3), 1334–1343. https://doi.org/www. dx.doi.org 10.31604/justitia.v9i3. 1334-1343.
     Google Scholar
  24. Widaningsih. (2019). The implementation of good faith principles in online sale and purchase. Kertha Wicaksana, 13(3), 62–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22225/kw.13.1.2019.62-68.
     Google Scholar
  25. Widiastiani, N. S. (2021). Pandemi Covid-19: Force Majeure dan Hardship Pada Perjanjian Kerja [Covid-19 Pandemic: Force Majeure and Hardship on Employment Agreements]. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 51(3), 698–719. http://jhp.ui.ac.id/index.php/home/article/view/3130.
     Google Scholar
  26. Winarsih, I., & Oktaviarni, F. (2021). Tanggung Jawab Penyedia Layanan Aplikasi Marketplace Terhadap Konsumen Dalam Transaksi Jual Beli Online di Provinsi Jambi [Responsibilities of marketplace application service providers to consumers in online buying and selling transactions in Jambi Province]. In Zaaken: Journal of Civil and Bussiness Law, 2,(8), http://online-journal.unja.ac.id/zaaken.
     Google Scholar
  27. Wiryawan, I. W. G. (2021). Urgensi Perlindungan Kurir Dalam Transaksi E-Commerce dengan Sistem COD (Cash On Delivery) [The Urgency of Courier Protection in E-Commerce Transactions with the COD (Cash On Delivery) System]. Jurnal Analisis Hukum, 4(2), 187–202. http://journal.undiknas.ac.id/index.php/JAH/article/view/3126.
     Google Scholar