Restorative Justice: An Approach in the Settlement of Land Crimes in the Indonesian National Police



Abstract Views
241

Downloads
201

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Mar 12, 2023
Published Apr 11, 2023
10.24018/ejpolitics.2023.2.2.78

Abstract viewed = 241 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

This study examines the use of restorative justice in dealing with land crimes at Police level. Land disputes that were originally civil often turn criminal. Various crimes on land are often under the jurisdiction of the South Sulawesi Regional Police. This study aims to identify and analyze the approach of restorative justice in solving land crimes as a police discretion and the implementation of restorative justice in solving land crimes by Indonesian National Police investigators. The restorative justice approach is part of the Polices discretion to deal with land crimes. The discretion given to police organizations cannot be separated from the universal nature of police law enforcement. This approach empowers the police to explore community values in solving land crimes through restorative justice. Among other things the negotiation of peace between victims and perpetrators of crimes on earth. The application of restorative justice in dealing with crimes on land is carried out through discussions between the complainant and the reported mediated by Indonesian National Police investigators. Afterwards the record of the peace agreement was signed and the report to the police station was cancelled. The application of restorative justice to land crimes aims to restore social cohesion in society. Cohesive values of unity become fragile when legal issues are passed over to pro-justice.

Keywords: land crimes restorative justice settlement

References

  1. Flora, H.S. (2018). Keadilan restoratif sebagai alternatif dalam penyelesaian tindak pidana dan pengaruhnya dalam sistem peradilan pidana di Indonesia [restorative justice as an alternative in settlement of crimes and its effects in the criminal justice system in Indonesia]. Ubelaj, 3(2), 142–158. Available at: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33369/ubelaj.3.2.142-158.
     Google Scholar
  2. Kurniati, N. (2016). Mediasi-arbitrase untuk penyelesaian sengketa tanah [Mediation-arbitration for land dispute settlement]. Sosiohumaniora, 18(3), 207–217. Available at: https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v18i3.10008.
     Google Scholar
  3. Lawalata, J.H., Titahelu, J.A.S. and Latupeirissa, J.E. (2022). Pendekatan restorative justice dalam penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana narkotika pada tahapan penyidikan di Indonesia [Restorative justice approach in settlement of narcotics crime cases at the stages of investigation in Indonesia]. TATOHI Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(1), 91–112.
     Google Scholar
  4. Pradityo, R. (2016). Restorative justice dalam restorative justice in juvenile justice system. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 5(3), 319–330. Available at: https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.5.3.2016.319-330.
     Google Scholar
  5. Ramadhan, A. (2021). Diskresi penyidik polri sebagai alternatif penanganan perkara pidana [Police investigator's discretion as an alternative to handling criminal cases]. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 6(1), 25–41. Available at: https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol6.iss1.art3.
     Google Scholar
  6. Rosy, K.O., Mangku, D.G.S. and Yuliartini, N.P.R. (2020). Peran mediasi dalam penyelesaian sengketa tanah adat setra karang rupit di pengadilan negeri singaraja kelas IB’. [the role of mediation in settlement of setra karang rupit customary land disputes at the singaraja class IB District Court]. Ganesha Law Review, 2(2), 167–179. Available at: https://ejournal2.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/GLR/article/view/207/158.
     Google Scholar
  7. Suhartono, P., Amiruddin and Pancaningrum, R.K. (2022). Tindakan diskresi penyidik dalam pelaksanaan penyidikan tindak Pidana (Studi di Polres Dompu)’. [Discretionary actions of investigators in carrying out criminal investigations (Study at the Dompu Polres)'] Unizar Law Review, 5(1), 1–19. Available at: https://doi.org/DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.53726/ulr.v5i1.573.
     Google Scholar
  8. Syaufi, A. (2020). Konstruksi model penyelesaian perkara pidana yang berorientasi pada keadilan restoratif. [construction of a restorative justice-oriented criminal case settlement model]. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Samudra Biru.
     Google Scholar
  9. Wagiu, J.D. (2015). Tinjauan yuridis terhadap asas keadilan restoratif dalam perkara tindak pidana penggelapan [Juridical review of the restorative justice principle in the case of embezzlement crime]. Lex Crimen, 4(1), 57–70.
     Google Scholar
  10. Wirawan, V. (2021). Rekonstruksi politik hukum penyelesaian sengketa tanah dan konflik tanah di Indonesia. [political reconstruction of legal settlement of land disputes and land conflicts in Indonesia]. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 9(1), 1–15. Available at: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/jhp.9.1.1-15.
     Google Scholar
  11. Zainuddin, Z. (2017). Restorative justice concept on jarimah qishas in islamic criminal law. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 17(3), 335. Available at: https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2017.17.3.826.
     Google Scholar
  12. Zainuddin, Z. (2022). The legal due diligence of land acquisition for the public interest: a critical review. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 4(1), 46–57. Available at: https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v4i1.159.
     Google Scholar