Studying the Fulfilment of Constitutional Rights by Implementing the Noken System in the General Elections in Papua English



Abstract Views
288

Downloads
289

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Apr 6, 2023
Published May 15, 2023
10.24018/ejpolitics.2023.2.3.86

Abstract viewed = 288 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

The purpose of this research is to analyze the general election system in Papua that uses the Noken system, which is related to the realization of citizens' constitutional rights regulated by the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The research method used is normative law using secondary data. The results of the study show that the Noken system in the implementation of regional elections in Papua is not democratic and is not in accordance with the principles of general elections, thus violating Article 43 of Law Number 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights. "The Noken system in organizing regional elections has no place in the constitution in Indonesia. The implementation of the Noken system in the implementation of local elections is subject to money politics or buying and selling of votes carried out by political elites with the help of local traditional leaders. The law has not been implemented optimally. Political education is still not much known by the indigenous people of Papua.

Keywords: Election Noken System Papua Pilkada

References

  1. Achwan, R. (2014). Reconceptualising political corruption in democratising societies. Asian Social Science, 10(11).
     Google Scholar
  2. Agustine, O. V. (2019). Implementasi Noken sebagai hukum tidak tertulis dalam sistem hukum nasional. RechtsVinding, 8(1), 69–84.
     Google Scholar
  3. Arief, B. N. (2021). Pembangunan Sistem Hukum Nasional Indonesia. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
     Google Scholar
  4. Ashsiddiqie, J. (2005). Kemerdekaan Berserikat, Pembubaran Partai Politik Dan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.
     Google Scholar
  5. Asshiddiqie, J. (2017). Gagasan Negara Hukum Indonesia.
     Google Scholar
  6. Aswandi, B., & Roisah, K. (2019). Negara Hukum Dan Demokrasi Pancasila Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM). Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 1(1), 128–45.
     Google Scholar
  7. Benuf, K., & Azhar, M. (2020). Metodologi penelitian hukum sebagai instrumen mengurai permasalahan hukum kontemporer. Gema Keadilan, 7(1), 20–33.
     Google Scholar
  8. Benuf, K. (2018). Politik hukum legislator dan ideologi Pancasila. Gema Keadilan, 5(1), 85–92. https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/gk/article/view/3670 (November 22, 2018).
     Google Scholar
  9. Berry, C. R., & Gersen, J. E. (2017). Agency design and political control. The Yale Law Journal, 126(4), 908–1241.
     Google Scholar
  10. Cahyo, P. (2017). Noken electoral system in papua deliberative democracy in Papuan tradition. Jurnal Masyarakat dan Budaya, 19(2), 219–36.
     Google Scholar
  11. Dahl, R. (2011). Perihal Demokrasi, Menelajahi Teori Dan Praktik Demokrasi Secara Singkat. Jakarta: Penerbit yayasan Obor.
     Google Scholar
  12. Dremliuga, R. (2020). General Legal Limits of the Application of the Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems within the Purview of International Humanitarian Law. Journal of Politics and Law, 13(2), 115–21.
     Google Scholar
  13. Efendi, J., & Ibrahim, J. (2018). Metode penelitian hukum normatif dan empiris. Jakarta: Prenada Media.
     Google Scholar
  14. Gambetta, D. (2002). Corruption: an analytical map. Dalam S. Kotkin Dan A. Sajo (Eds), Political corruption in urban America. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
     Google Scholar
  15. Huda, N., & Nasef, M. I. (2017). Penataan demokrasi dan pemilu di Indonesia pasca reformasi. Yogyakarta: Kencana.
     Google Scholar
  16. Jamaludin, T. (2018). Kesuksesan Dan Problematika Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Secara Langsung Di Indonesia. Jurnal Etika & Pemilu, 4(1), 75–89.
     Google Scholar
  17. Kanem, V., & Norris, A. N. (2018). An examination of the Noken and indigenous cultural identity: voices of Papuan women. Journal of Cultural Analysis and Social Change, 3(1), 1–11.
     Google Scholar
  18. Lestari, Y. S. (2017). Kartel Politik Dan Korupsi Politik Di Indonesia. Pandecta: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum (Research Law Journal), 12(1), 67–75.
     Google Scholar
  19. Levinson, D., & Sachs, B. I. (2015). Political entrenchment and public law. The Yale Law Journal, 125(2), 326–559.
     Google Scholar
  20. Lim, M. (2014). Informational terrains of identity and political power: the internet in Indonesia. Antropologi Indonesia, 2(1), 23–41.
     Google Scholar
  21. Mas’oed, M. (1999). Negara kapital dan demokrasi. 2nd ed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
     Google Scholar
  22. Michael, T. (2016). Korelasi komunisme dalam demokrasi di Indonesia. Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(1), 15–28.
     Google Scholar
  23. Nonet, P., & Selznick, P. (1978). Law and Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law. London: Harper and Raw Publisher.
     Google Scholar
  24. Nuna, M., & Moonti, R. M. (2019). Kebebasan hak sosial-politik dan partisipasi warga negara dalam sistem demokrasi di Indonesia. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 4(2), 110–27.
     Google Scholar
  25. Pawestri, A. Y. (2019). Cita hukum dan demokrasi dalam sistem penegakan hukum lingkungan Indonesia. Fairness and Justice: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum, 17(2), 96–111.
     Google Scholar
  26. Satria, H. (2019). Politik hukum tindak pidana politik uangdalam pemilihan umum di Indonesia. Jurnal Antikorupsi INTEGRITAS, 5(1), 1–14.
     Google Scholar
  27. Sitaraman, G. (2021). The political economy of the removal power. Harvard Law Review, 134(398), 398–441.
     Google Scholar
  28. Soemarsono, M. (2007). Negara hukum Indonesia ditinjau dari sudut teori tujuan negara. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 37(2), 300–322.
     Google Scholar
  29. Sonata, D. L. (2014). Metode penelitian hukum normatif dan empiris karakteristik khas dari metode meneliti hukum. Fiat Justisia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(1), 15–35.
     Google Scholar
  30. Surbakti, R., Supriyadi, D., Asy’ari, H. (2011). Merancang sistem politik demokrasi, menuju pemerintahan presidensial yang efektif. Jakarta: Penerbit Kemitraan bagi Pembaharuan Tata Pemerintaha.
     Google Scholar
  31. Suteki, & Taufani, G. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum (Filsafat, Teori, Dan Praktik). In ed. 3. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 176.
     Google Scholar
  32. Swasono, S. E. (2008). Tentang Demokrasi Ekonomi Indonesia. Jakarta: Bappenas.
     Google Scholar
  33. Wangga, M. S. E., Agung Kardono, R. B., & Wirawan, A. (2019). Penegakan hukum korupsi politik. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 21(1), 39–60.
     Google Scholar
  34. Zhao, M. (2019). The illicit distribution of precursor chemicals in China: a qualitative and quantitative analysis. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 8(3), 106–15.
     Google Scholar