Political Identity Negotiation of Young Electorates in Ghanaian Colleges of Education
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
The formation of political in-groups and out-groups on campuses and involvement in political discourses in and out of the school setting clearly demonstrate students’ political attitudes and behaviours which eventually reflect or sum up their political identities. However, it remains a mystery the exact ingredient cooking up this form of social identity. The study, as a result, was conducted to explore the factors underlying the political identity negotiation of students in colleges of education and to identify practices that reflect their explicit and implicit political behaviours and attitudes. The paper focused on examining factors that influenced political identity negotiation among college of education students in Ghana. In order to answer all four research questions, the concurrent triangulation mixed method approach to inquiry was adopted. Data collected were descriptively analysed, using the measure of central tendency and narration. Three factors were revealed as being influential in student teachers’ identity formation: familial characteristics such as the level of education of parents, political preference, and occupation, among others; liberal school setting such as the ethnic composition of the student population; and new political stimuli such as contact with campaigns and volunteer services. Implicit and explicit political attitudes and behaviours of student-teachers were found to be evident through practices such as voting in student elections and participation in political discourses. The paper concludes that political identity negotiation of young adults is inevitable as a result of the different political cues they encounter within the social structures.
References
-
Acconciamessa, M., Ahmed, S., Tang, B., Brownstein, S. & Moreno, M. (2016). Millennials in 2016. Berkely, California: University of California Berkeley. Retrieved from http://people.ischool.berkeley.edu/~saif/w209/final
Google Scholar
1
-
Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
2
-
Cao, N. (2017). College students’ political identity: Connotation, crisis and countermeasure. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 113, 131-136. London: Atlantis Press.
Google Scholar
3
-
Carter, K.A. & McClellan, G.S. (2000). An overview of relevant theories and models for student affairs practice. In M.J. Barr & M.K. Desler (Eds.), The handbook of student affairs administration (pp. 231-248). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
4
-
Cass, V. (1996). Sexual orientation identity formation: A Western phenomenon. In R. P. Cabaj & T. S. Stein (Eds.), Textbook of homosexuality and mental health (pp. 227-251). Arlington, VA, US: American Psychiatric Association.
Google Scholar
5
-
CIRCLE (2016). Total youth votes in 2016 primaries and caucuses. The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning and Engagement. Retrieved from http://civicyouth.org/total-youth-votes-in-2016-primaries-and-caucuses.
Google Scholar
6
-
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education, (8th ed.). New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Google Scholar
7
-
Dinas, E. (2014). The long shadow of parental political socialization on the development of political orientations. The Forum, 12(3), 397-416. DOI 10.1515/for-2014-5013.
Google Scholar
8
-
Erikson, E. H. (1968) Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: W.W. Norton.
Google Scholar
9
-
Feldman, K.A. & Newcomb, T.M. (1969). The impact of college on students. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
10
-
French, S. E., Seidman, E., Allen, L., & Aber, J. L. (2006). The development of ethnic identity during adolescence. Developmental psychology, 42(1), 1-7.
Google Scholar
11
-
Fry, R., Igielnik, R., & Patten, E. (2018). How Millennials today compare with their grandparents 50 years ago. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/facttank/2018/03/16/how-millennials-compare-with-theirgrandparents.
Google Scholar
12
-
Gamson, Z. (1966). Utilitarian and normative orientations toward education. Sociology of Education, 39, 46-73.
Google Scholar
13
-
Guangqing, X. (2015). How to create a good political ecology. Journal of Exploration and Contention, 8(2), 67-73.
Google Scholar
14
-
Hajnal, Z., & Lee, T. (2006). Race, immigration, and political independents in America. California, CA: University of California.
Google Scholar
15
-
Jennings, M., Stoker, L., & Bowers, J. (2009). Politics across generations: Family transmission reexamined. The Journal of Politics, 71(3), 782-799.
Google Scholar
16
-
Kroh, M. & Selb, P. (2009). Inheritance and the dynamics of party identification. Political Behavior, 31(4), 559-574. DOI: 10.1007/s11109-009-9084-2.
Google Scholar
17
-
Maniam, S. & Smith, S. (2017). A wider partisan and ideological gap between younger, older generations. Pew Research Center.
Google Scholar
18
-
Retrieved from: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-19 tank/2017/03/20/awider-partisan-and-ideological-gap-between-youngeroldergenerations/.
Google Scholar
19
-
Mulberry, S.L. (2010). Political identity of first-year college students: An analysis of student characteristics using cooperative institutional research program (CIRP) data. Dissertation. University of North Texas.
Google Scholar
20
-
Murray, H.A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
21
-
Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
22
-
Pew Research Center (2010). Millennials: Confident. Connected. Open to Change. Retrieved from: http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2010/02/24/millennials-confident-connected-opentochange.
Google Scholar
23
-
Rico, G. & Jennings, K. (2016). The formation of left-right identification: Pathways and correlates of parental influence. Political Psychology, 37(2), 237-252. DOI:10.1111/pops.12243.
Google Scholar
24
-
Ryan, T. (2017) How do indifferent voters decide? The political importance of implicit attitudes. American Journal of Political Science, 61(4), 892-907. DOI:10.1111/ajps.12307.
Google Scholar
25
-
Vraga, E. K. (2014). How party affiliation conditions the experience of dissonance and explains polarization and selective exposure. Social Science Quarterly, 96(2), 382-388. Retrieved from: https://doi-org.proxy.lib.utc.edu/10.1111/ssqu.12138.
Google Scholar
26
-
Wolak, J. (2009). Explaining change in party identification in adolescence. Electoral Studies, 28(4), 573-583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2009.05.020.
Google Scholar
27