Judicial Commission Role to Handle Contempt of Court in Indonesia from the Perspective of Islamic Legal Thought



Abstract Views
484

Downloads
339

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Apr 27, 2023
Published May 24, 2023
10.24018/ejpolitics.2023.2.3.90

Abstract viewed = 484 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Contempt of Court still occurs in many courts in Indonesia. Therefore, the government established the Judicial Commission of the Republic of Indonesia to maintain the dignity and dignity of the courts in Indonesia. This study discusses how the Judicial Commission of the Republic of Indonesia plays a role in handling the Contempt of Court in Indonesia from the perspective of Islamic Legal Thought. This research is literature with a qualitative approach. Data was collected through literature studies in the form of laws, books, and journals. The collected data is analyzed descriptively with a deductive model. This research shows that the Judicial Commission has been essential in preventing the Contempt of Court in Indonesia. The Judicial Commission of the Republic of Indonesia carries preventive and repressive actions. Preventive actions are carried out to avoid the Contempt of Court, while repressive actions are carried out to deal with the Contempt of Court in Indonesia. In Islamic legal thought, the role of the Judicial Commission is according to the role of Diwan al-Hisbah and the rule of Islamic Law "dar' al-mafasid muqaddam ala jalb al-mashalih" (rejecting harm is prioritized over bringing benefit) and "al-dharar yuzal" (damage must be eliminated). The role of the Judicial Commission in resolving Contempt of Court cases can make courts a safe place to enforce the law in Indonesia.

Keywords: Contempt of Court Diwan al-Hisbah Islamic Legal Thought Judge Judicial Commission

References

  1. Ady Putra Slamat Vivi Sitorus. (2014). Upaya Penegakan Hukum terhadap Contempt of Court dalam Peradilan di Indonesia (Law Enforcement Efforts Against Contempt of Court in Indonesian Courts). https://hsgm.saglik.gov.tr/depo/birimler/saglikli-beslenme-hareketli-hayat-db/Yayinlar/kitaplar/diger-kitaplar/TBSA-Beslenme-Yayini.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  2. Afriana, A., Artaji, Rusmiati, E., Fakhriah, E. L., & Putri, S. (2018). Contempt of Court: Penegakan Hukum dan Model Pengaturan di Indonesia (Contempt of Court: Law Enforcement and Regulatory Models in Indonesia). Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 7(3), 441–458. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.7.3.2018.441-458.
     Google Scholar
  3. Agustian, T., & Salim, C. (2021). The Problems of the Independence of Judicial Power in Indonesia in a Review of Islamic Law. Jurnal Mahkamah: Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Hukum Islam, 6(2), 163–180. https://doi.org/10.25217/jm v6i2.1896.
     Google Scholar
  4. Ahmad, S. D. (2020). Legal Sanctions Against Contempt of Court Actors: Analysis Based on Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure Code. Ayer Journal, 27(4), 27–40.
     Google Scholar
  5. Azhar, A., Badarulzaman, M. H., Muhammad, F., & Zaib, S. Z. M. (2020). Sharī’ah Criminal Law Enforcement in Hisbah Framework: Practice in Malaysia. Light & Engineering, 28(01), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.33383/2020-01.
     Google Scholar
  6. Azizah. (2019, August 1). Badan Diklat MA dan IKAHI Adakan Seminar Nasional tentang Contempt Of Court (MA Education and Training Agency and IKAHI Hold National Seminar on Contempt of Court). Www.Mahkamahagung.Go.Id. https://www.mahkamahagung.go.id/id/be rita/3690/badan-diklat-ma-dan-ikahi- adakan-seminar-nasional-tentang- contempt-of-court.
     Google Scholar
  7. Azrin, I. (2019). The Fundamentals of Hisbah Strategic in Developing of Human Civilization. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 25(1), 1–5. https://www.proquest.com/openview/78f6da6c97572793d1eb67742a106bde/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=29726.
     Google Scholar
  8. Blake, W. D. (2018). Judicial Independence on Unelected State Supreme Courts. Justice System Journal, 39(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/0098261X.2017.1385431.
     Google Scholar
  9. Button, M., Shepherd, D., & Blackbourn, D. (2018). ‘The Iceberg Beneath The Sea’ Fraudsters And Their Punishment Through Non-Criminal Justice In The ‘Fraud Justice Network’ in England and Wales. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 53(October 2017), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2018.03.001.
     Google Scholar
  10. Castillo Ortiz, P. J. (2017). Councils of the Judiciary and Judges’ Perceptions of Respect to Their Independence in Europe. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 9(2), 315–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-017-0061-2.
     Google Scholar
  11. Connolly, M. (2018). Statutory Interpretation, Victimization under Equality Law, and its “on-off” Relationship with Contempt of Court. Statute Law Review, 39(1), 72–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmw044.
     Google Scholar
  12. Disemadi, H. S., & Roisah, K. (2019). Urgency of the Contempt of Court Criminalization Policy to Overcome Harassment Against the Status and Dignity of Courts. Brawijaya Law Journal, 6(2), 224–233. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.blj.2019.006.02.07.
     Google Scholar
  13. Djula, S. R., Badu, L. W., & Sarson, M. T. Z. (2019). The Formation of the Contempt of Court Law to Maintain the Dignity of Peradi and Indonesia. 1(1), 223–241.
     Google Scholar
  14. Fanani, A., & Takayasa, T. I. (2022). Hisbah in Public Moral and Marketplace Control: From Historical to Indonesian contexts. HIKMATUNA: Journal for Integrative Islamic Studies, 8(1), 40–54. https://doi.org/10.28918/hikmatuna.v8i1.4666.
     Google Scholar
  15. Fauzan, M., Ardhanariswari, R., & Komari, A. (2017). Model of Judges Supervision for Indonesia Independent Judicial Power Implementation. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 17(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2017.17.1.831.
     Google Scholar
  16. Fitri, A. (2009). Studi Analisis Peran Lembaga Hisbah pada Masa Pemerintahan Khalifah Umar Ibn Khattab (Study Analysis of the Role of Hisbah Institutions during the Reign of Caliph Umar Ibn Khattab). IAIN Walisongo Semarang.
     Google Scholar
  17. Freer, E. (2020). Experts and Pretenders: Examining Possible Responses to Misconduct by Experts in Criminal Trials in England and Wales. International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 24(2), 180–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365712720913336.
     Google Scholar
  18. Garoupa, N., & Magalhães, P. C. (2021). Public Trust in the European Legal Systems: Independence, Accountability and Awareness. West European Politics, 44(3), 690–713. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2020.1715605.
     Google Scholar
  19. Ghofur, A., Shabir, M., & Asiyah, N. (2022). Wilāyah al-ḥisbah and its Urgency to the Modern Economy in Indonesia. Webology, 19(1), 5867–5878. https://www.webology.org/data-cms/articles/20220206011440pm19393.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  20. Goodrich, P. (2018). The Example of Undressing: Obnubilations on the Empty Space of the Rule. Law and Literature, 30(3), 409–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/1535685X.2017.1379178.
     Google Scholar
  21. Constitution of 1945 Third Amendment, 3 Jaringan Dokumentasi dan Informasi Hukum 1 (1945). http://jdih.bpk.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/UUD45_perubahan3.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  22. Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 22 of 2004 concerning the Judicial Commission, 1 (2004).
     Google Scholar
  23. Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 18 of 2011 concerning Amendments to Law Number 22 of 2004 concerning the Judicial Commission, www.bphn.go.id 1 (2011). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22174227%0Ahttp://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=454%0Ahttps://litigation-essentials.lexisnexis.com/webcd/app?action=DocumentDisplay&crawlid=1&doctype=cite&docid=43+Tex.+Tech+L.+Rev.+757&srctype.
     Google Scholar
  24. Halim, M. (2011). Eksistensi Wilayatul Hisbah dalam Sistem Pemerintahan Islam (The Existence of Wilayatul Hisbah in the Islamic Government System). Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura, 10(2), 65–81. https://books.google.com.my/books?id=_DbFt86MNqAC&printsec=frontcover&hl=id#v=onepage&q&f=false.
     Google Scholar
  25. Hasbullah. (n.d.). Wilayatul Hisbah sebagai Lembaga Pelaksana Amar Ma‘ruf Nahi Munkar; Studi Historikel Wilayatul Hisbah dalam Islam (Wilayatul Hisbah as the implementing agency of Amar Ma’ruf Nahi Munkar; Historical Studies of Wilayatul Hisbah in Islam). 1–30. https://adoc.pub/wilayatul-hisbah-sebagai-lembaga-pelaksana-amar-ma-ruf-nahi-.html.
     Google Scholar
  26. Hasibuan, O. (2015). Contempt of Court di Indonesia, Perlukah? (Contempt of Court In Indonesia, is It Necessary?). Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 4(2), 267–274.
     Google Scholar
  27. Jaafar, A. J., Ibrahim, M. T., Ismail, H., & Mohmud, M. S. (2021). Hisbah Institution and Its Role in Environmental Conservation in Islamic Civilization. Jurnal Islam Dan Masyarakat Kontemporari, 22(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37231/jimk.2021.22.1.526.
     Google Scholar
  28. Kosař, D., & Spáč, S. (2018). Conceptualizations of Judicial Independence and Judicial Accountability by the European Network of Councils for the Judiciary Two Steps forward One Step Back. International Journal for Court Administration, 9(3), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.284.
     Google Scholar
  29. Lee, H., & Lee, T. (2019). From Contempt of Court to Fake News: Public Legitimisation and Governance in Mediated Singapore. Media International Australia, 173(1), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X19853074.
     Google Scholar
  30. Mariniello, T. (2019). Prolonged Emergency and Derogation of Human Rights: Why the European Court should Raise its Immunity System. German Law Journal, 20(1), 46–71. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2019.3.
     Google Scholar
  31. Musmuliadin, Indarti, E., & Rochaeti, N. (2022). Contempt of Court in Renewal of Indonesian Criminal Law Based on Pancasila. International Conference Restructuring and Transforming Law 2022, 1(1), 148–158. https://doi.org/10.15797/concom.2019..23.009.
     Google Scholar
  32. Musyafa’ah, N. L. (2017). Tugas dan Wewenang Komisi Yudisial Jawa Timur terhadap Pengawasan Hakim Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Duties and Authorities of the East Java Judicial Commission on Supervision of Corruption Judges). Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam, 3(2), 277–306. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15642/aj.2017.3.2.277-306.
     Google Scholar
  33. Musyafa’ah, N. L., Rohman, H., Rohman, M. F., Solikin, A., Ilmiyah, Z., Ul, & Nooriansyah, S. (2022). Pendampingan Mahasiswa Klinik Etik dan Advokasi untuk Menjaga Marwah Pengadilan di Indonesia (Assisting Ethics and Advocacy Clinic Students to Maintain the Spirit of the Court in Indonesia). 3rd Annual Conference an Community Engagement, 419–434. https://doi.org/10.15642/acce.v3i.
     Google Scholar
  34. Musyafa’ah, N. L., & Wijaya, A. (2020). Pelayanan Publik pada Dinas Kependudukan Dan Pencatatan Sipil Di Kabupaten Lamongan Dalam Perspektif Fikih Siyasah (Public Service at the Population and Civil Registration Office in Lamongan Regency from the Perspective of Fiqh Siyasah). Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Perundangan Islam, 10(02), 251–274. https://doi.org/DOI: https://doi.org/10.15642/ad.2020.10.2.251-274.
     Google Scholar
  35. Musyafaah, N. L., Warjiyati, S., & Syafaq, H. (2021). Tindak Pidana Contempt of Court perspektif Hukum Islam (Criminal Contempt of Court from the Perspectives of Islamic Law). Al-Jinayah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam, 7(2), 283–303. https://doi.org/10.15642/aj.2021.7.2.283-302.
     Google Scholar
  36. Prasedyomukti, A. F., & Suharto, R. B. (2018). The Role of Judicial Commission on Supervision of Judge’s Crime in Indonesia. Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 1(4), 895–902. https://doi.org/10.30659/jdh.v1i4.3931.
     Google Scholar
  37. Rowden, E., & Wallace, A. (2018). Remote judging: The impact of video links on the image and the role of the judge. International Journal of Law in Context, 14(4), 504–524. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552318000216.
     Google Scholar
  38. Rozikin, O. (2019). Contempt of Court in Indonesian Regulation. JCIC : Jurnal CIC Lembaga Riset Dan Konsultan Sosial, 1(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.51486/jbo.v1i1.1.
     Google Scholar
  39. Ruhijat, T. R., Roejito, Kapopang, H., Imran, Rahma, F., Dewi, R. D. C. H. N. H. S. P. W. N. D. E., & Putra, D. G. dan S. A. W. W. E. (2019). Menuju Komisi Yudisial Kredibel dan Unggul (Towards a Credible and Superior Judicial Commission). Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia.
     Google Scholar
  40. Sahih International. (n.d.-a). Surah Al-Imran Ayat 104 (3:104 Quran) With Tafsir. Myislam.Org. https://myislam.org/surah-imran/ayat-104/.
     Google Scholar
  41. Sahih International. (n.d.-b). Surah An-Nisa Ayat 135 (4:135 Quran) With Tafsir. https://myislam.org/surah-an-nisa/ayat-135/.
     Google Scholar
  42. Saleh, I. A. (2014). Konsep Pengawasan Kehakiman (Concept of Judicial Supervision). Setara Press.
     Google Scholar
  43. Salim, S., Abdullah, S. F. B., & Bin Ahmad, K. (2015). Wilayat Al-Hisba; A Means to Achieve Justice and Maintain High Ethical Standards in Societies. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(4S2), 201–206. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4s2p201.
     Google Scholar
  44. Saputra, F. (2013). Kedudukan Komisi Yudisial sebagai Lembaga Negara (Position of the Judicial Commission as a State Institution). Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Legal Opinion, 1(1), 1–5. file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/fvm939e.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  45. Setiawan, A. (2016). Peran Komisi Yudisial Dalam Pengawasan Kode Etik Hakim Perspektif Fiqh Siyasah (The Role of the Judicial Commission in Supervising the Judge’s Code of Ethics from the Perspective of Fiqh Siyasah). Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Perundangan Islam, 6(1), 53–79. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15642/ad.2016.6.1.53-79.
     Google Scholar
  46. Shabana, R., & Ph, D. (2022). Hisbah and Islamic Human Rights. 4(4), 534–546. https://doi.org/10.52279/jlss.04.04.534546.
     Google Scholar
  47. Sillen, J. (2019). The concept of “internal judicial independence” in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. European Constitutional Law Review, 15(1), 104–133. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019619000014.
     Google Scholar
  48. Subarsyah, T. (2020). Contempt of Court in Indonesian Criminal Justice System. International Journal of Scienceand Society, 2(3), 312–321.
     Google Scholar
  49. Sundari, E., & Retnowati, A. (2021). The Weakness of the Control System for Fighting Corruption in the Judicial Process: The Case of Indonesia. International Journal Of Social Policy And Law, 2(1), 93–102. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.8888/ijospl.v2i1.35.
     Google Scholar
  50. Tarigan, M. I. (2021, April 21). Explainer: Bagaimana Penghinaan Terhadap Peradilan diatur di Indonesia (Explainer: How Contempt of Justice is Regulated in Indonesia). IJRS. http://ijrs.or.id/explainer-bagaimana-penghinaan-terhadap-peradilan-diatur-di-indonesia/.
     Google Scholar
  51. Torres Pérez, A. (2020). From Portugal to Poland: The Court of Justice of the European Union as Watchdog of Judicial Independence. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 27(1), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X19892185.
     Google Scholar
  52. Wamsley, D. (2019). Neoliberalism, Mass Incarceration, and the US Debt–Criminal Justice Complex. Critical Social Policy, 39(2), 248–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018318779477.
     Google Scholar