Compensation Assessment in Land Procurement for Public Interest in Providing Justice



Abstract Views
175

Downloads
179

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted May 7, 2023
Published Jun 13, 2023
10.24018/ejpolitics.2023.2.3.99

Abstract viewed = 175 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Land procurement for public interest is an important action for the development of public infrastructure that often leads to conflicts between landowners and the government regarding the compensation received by landowners. Therefore, fair and transparent compensation assessment is crucial in providing justice for landowners affected by land procurement. This research aims to analyze and evaluate the mechanisms, issues, and solutions for compensation assessment in land procurement for public interest in Indonesia. Based on literature studies, this research shows that the compensation assessment mechanisms applied by the government in Indonesia have not fully provided justice for landowners. Several factors affecting the compensation assessment mechanisms, such as non-objective land prices, differences in perceptions between landowners and the government regarding land values, and differences in views regarding the concept of fair compensation, are obstacles in providing justice in land procurement for public interest. Therefore, reforms in compensation assessment mechanisms are necessary to make them more transparent and fair for landowners. The government needs to consult with landowners and local communities to obtain a joint agreement regarding land procurement for public interest, so that justice can be upheld in land procurement for public interest.
Keywords: Evaluation General Justice Land

References

  1. Abdurrahman. (1991). Masalah Pencabutan Hak-Hak Atas Tanah dan Pembebasan Tanah di Indonesia. Citra Aditya Bakti.
     Google Scholar
  2. Andreoni, V., & Miola, A. (2016). Competitiveness and Sustainable Development Goals. In European Union (Issue January). https://doi.org/10.2788/64453.
     Google Scholar
  3. Azzam, M. (2023). Ganti Rugi Dinilai Terlalu Rendah, Warga Citaman Korban Pembangunan Tol Japek 2 Bakal Ajukan Gugatan. Tribunbekasi.Com. https://bekasi.tribunnews.com/2023/01/31/ganti-rugi-dinilai-terlalu-rendah-warga-citaman-korban-pembangunan-tol-japek-2-bakal-ajukan-gugatan.
     Google Scholar
  4. Harjono, D. K. (2023). Tanggung Jawab Penilai dalam Pengadaan Tanah bagi Pembangunan untuk Kepentingan Umum. Jurnal Hukum Indonesia, 2(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.58344/jhi.v1i2.7.
     Google Scholar
  5. Hoogendam, P., & Boelens, R. (2019). Dams and damages. Conflicting epistemological frameworks and interests concerning “compensation” for the Misicuni project’s socio-environmental impacts in Cochabamba, Bolivia. Water (Switzerland), 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030408.
     Google Scholar
  6. Indriasti Wardani, W. (2021). Harmonisasi Lembaga Bank Tanah dengan Pengaturan Pengadaan Hak Atas Tanah Bagi Pembangunan untuk Kepentingan Umum. Spektrum Hukum, 18(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.35973/sh.v18i2.2476.
     Google Scholar
  7. Kotalewala, F., Laturette, A. I., & Uktolseja, N. (2020). Penyelesaian Sengketa dalam Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pembangunan Jalan untuk Kepentingan Umum. Sasi, 26(3), 415–433. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v26i3.397.
     Google Scholar
  8. Nulhaqim, S. A., Hidayat, E. N., & Fedryansyah, M. (2020). Upaya Preventif Konflik Penggusuran Lahan. Share : Social Work Journal, 10(1), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.24198/share.v10i1.26896.
     Google Scholar
  9. Prambowo, E. S. (2020). Pengaruh Independensi, Profesionalisme, Dan Etika Profesi Auditor Terhadap Kinerja Auditor. Jurnal Ilmu Dan Riset Akuntansi, 9(11), 1–23.
     Google Scholar
  10. Rachmawan, D. (2016). Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Proses Pembangunan Jalan Raya Di Kawasan Pedesaan: Studi Kasus Di Desa Plosorejo, Kecamatan Kepanjen, Kabupaten Malang. Jurnal Tata Kota dan Daerah. Jurnal Sosiologi, 20(2), 193–212.
     Google Scholar
  11. Rahmadani, P. (2022). Penyelesaian Sengketa Ganti Kerugian Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Pembangunan Jalan Tol Section Binjai-Pangkalan Brandan Berbasis Perlindungan Hukum. Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, 1(4), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.56128/ljoalr.v1i4.68.
     Google Scholar
  12. Susilowati, K. D. S., Riwajant, N. I., & Muwidha, M. (2021). Penilaian Properti (Appraisal): Konsep dan Aplikasi. Media Nusa Creative (MNC Publishing).
     Google Scholar
  13. Yıldız, T. D. (2020). Effects of the Private Land Acquisition Process and Costs on Mining Enterprises before Mining Operation Activities in Turkey. Land Use Policy, 97(May), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104784.
     Google Scholar
  14. Zarkasih, H., & Amelia, M. (2019). Pelaksanaan Peran Serta Masyarakat Pada Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum (Studi Kasus Pelebaran Jalan Di Kota Praya, Kabupaten Lombok Tengah). Media Keadilan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 9(2), 142–158. https://doi.org/10.31764/jmk.v9i2.891.
     Google Scholar